Topics : Art
Culture - Fashion
& Hot Bollywood Film News : *
News - Hindi Cinema Reviews - Previews - Music Chart -
Censorship and festivals
don't go together, say filmmakers
Panaji, Nov 22 The issue of censorship rules for films festivals
has raised its head once again here ahead of the 11-day
International Film Festival of India (IFFI) beginning here
Thursday, with documentary filmmakers opposed to the current
"IFFI 2006 has the precise rules the Bombay high court stuck
down for the National Film Awards in June, especially regarding
the 'no censor certificate requirement' for Doordarshan/student
films though a certificate is required for all other films,"
said award winning filmmaker Rakesh Sharma.
IFFI, which is hailed as "India's Cannes", showcases both
feature and non-feature films.
Film censorship has been a major issue for directors, especially
those in the documentary world, for whom free expression is a
crucial part of their attempts to raise crucial and often
Anand Patwardhan, a well-known independent filmmaker, told IANS:
""It is most unfortunate that the government has not understood
the spirit and logic behind the High Court judgement on the
National Film Awards."
According to Patwardhan, the court had ruled that when the task
before a jury is to select the best films in the country, and
when there already are provisions within the law to exempt film
festival spaces from censorship, there is no reason to insist on
censor certificates as a pre-requisite to eligibility.
"By extension, the same logic should have applied to the Indian
Panorama (section in the IFFI) so that the best films could be
selected, regardless of certification," he said.
Anand Patwardhan is known for his deep involvement with civil
liberties and democratic rights. His "War and Peace" (2001) made
news when the Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC)
refused to give a certificate to the film without making cuts,
and 'uncertified' films were disallowed from entering
government-sponsored film festivals.
Sharma pointed out the politics involved in selection of films.
"Several documentaries that won international awards are totally
missing from the (IFFI 2006) Indian Panorama list. These include
Gaurav Jani's 'Riding Solo to the Top of the World', Amudhan's
'Pee' and Atul Gupta's 'Waiting', about the missing in Kashmir.
'Final Solution' (by Sharma himself) has won 20 international
awards by now," said Sharma.
He brought out the "curious" case of his 'Final Solution', which
talks about the perils of religious fundamentalism and
intolerance in India today.
In 2004, it was stuck at the censors and didn't get invited to
the IFFI, despite winning two awards at Berlin. In 2005, the
government disallowed the film from the National Film Awards on
grounds that it had obtained a censor certificate but not in
"So though it was produced in 2004 and won awards in 2004, for
the directorate of film festivals, the film simply did not exist
in 2004 - it was made only in 2005!" said a woeful Sharma.
In its June 2006 judgement, the Bombay High Court questioned the
logic and consistency of the policy framed by the government of
India for the screening of films for festivals in India - both
national and international.
Several networks against censorship have been launched. Films
For Freedom, India, calls itself an "action platform" of over
300 Indian documentary filmmakers. They have come together as a
"Campaign Against Censorship" in response to an "attempt by the
Mumbai International Film Festival to impose censorship on
Indian films", according to the group.
The CBFC notes that it is "popularly known as the Censor Board"
and reminds visitors to its site that "all films meant for
public exhibition, irrespective of their length, whether in
celluloid or video or CD or DVD version are subjected to
It quotes the Supreme Court of India saying: "Film censorship
becomes necessary because a film motivates thought and action
and assures a high degree of attention and retention as compared
to the printed word .... Therefore, it has as much potential for
evil as it has for good and has an equal potential to instil or
cultivate violent or good behaviour."